For most of the 20th century, human IQ scores reliably increased with every generation—a phenomenon known as the Flynn Effect. However, recent longitudinal studies have shown that in many industrialized nations, this trend has stalled or even reversed, leading to the “Reverse Flynn Effect”.
Before you jump to conclusions, this does not mean Gen Z is genetically “less intelligent” than their parents. This is one of the most common misunderstandings today. The decline in traditional IQ scores—specifically in verbal reasoning and math—is heavily environmental. We are actually witnessing a “cognitive reconfiguration” as brains adapt to a digital ecosystem.
Because we now constantly practice “cognitive offloading”—outsourcing our memory and problem-solving to search engines and AI—we are losing our capacity for deep focus. This state of “continuous partial attention,” fueled by notifications and endless scrolling, weakens our long-term memory and deep reading skills.
The Great Cognitive Shift: Are We Getting Less Intelligent?
This cognitive fragmentation explains the historic drop in the OECD’s 2022 PISA academic performance scores across the globe. A frequent mistake is blaming this massive educational decline entirely on the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic was disruptive, reports clearly indicate that the downward trends in reading and math started before 2018. The structural shift toward a smartphone-based childhood is the deeper root cause here
The PISA Collapse and the COVID Myth and The Emotional Intelligence (EQ) Paradox
So, if cognitive styles are shifting, what about emotional and social skills? The literature presents a fascinating, sometimes contradictory, picture.
On one hand, Gen Z is celebrated as an incredibly inclusive, self-aware, and socially conscious generation. However, because their communication is heavily screen-based, researchers note they often struggle with traditional face-to-face interactions and real-time conflict resolution.
Interestingly, there are distinct gender nuances in how this emotional intelligence manifests. Studies indicate that Gen Z females tend to score higher in emotional attention (focusing deeply on their feelings), while males generally score higher in emotional repair (the ability to regulate stress and bounce back from negative moods)
Quarter-Life Crises and the Workplace Revolution
Currently, Gen Z is facing unprecedented levels of anxiety and a widespread "quarter-life crisis," characterized by identity confusion and fear of the future. Here is where Emotional Intelligence becomes their superpower. Research highlights that high EQ acts as a critical psychological shield for this generation, significantly boosting life satisfaction and directly reducing depressive symptoms
As they step into the workplace, they are completely changing the rules. Gen Z employees don't just want a salary; they demand purpose-driven work and psychological safety. For them, having an empathetic, emotionally intelligent leader is not a luxury—it is a necessity for their engagement and productivity
The Takeaway
When we read about Gen Z, it is crucial not to confuse technological adaptation with a lack of capability. Their brains aren’t broken; they are just wired for a completely different world. Our challenge isn’t to force them into old molds, but to foster environments where their high empathy and digital fluency can shine, while helping them rebuild the deep focus that screens have taken away.
Thanks for reading, and feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below!
Aranda, C. (2025). The decline of the intelligence quotient in the digital age: Cognitive reconfiguration and global trends. Pressenza – International Press Agency.
Banu, P., & Rani, S. (2025). Emotional intelligence across generational cohorts: A comparative review. European Economic Letters, 15(3), 3248-3256.
Bazmi, F. D., Nirmala, K. V., Bathia, A., Rani, G., Parween, S., & Dsouza, J. J. (2025). Emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness in multigenerational workplace. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(S5), 8-31.
Caesarani, E. S., & Mahardayani, I. H. (2026). The relationship between career success expectations and emotional intelligence with quarter life crisis in Generation Z. Journal of Research of Social Science Economics and Management, 5(7), 10139-10151.
Degen, R. J. (2025). The cognitive decline of Generation Z: Technological dependence, digital overexposure and the historic collapse of PISA performance. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 14(4), 1-11.
Dworak, E. M., Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2023). Looking for Flynn effects in a recent online U.S. adult sample: Examining shifts within the SAPA Project. Intelligence, 98, 101734.
Evrensel-İnanç, E., Aydoğmuş, C., Metin-Camgöz, S., & Özdilek, E. (2022). For Generation Z: What is the underlying reason between emotional intelligence and depression relationship?. Sosyoekonomi, 30(53), 27-48.
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6.
Kašparová, P., & Linhart, O. (2023). How to work with Generation Z: Cluster analysis based on emotional intelligence of university students. Hradec Economic Days, 284-291.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. PISA, OECD Publishing.
Sanz-Martín, D., Caracuel-Cáliz, R. F., Alonso-Vargas, J. M., & Ramírez-Granizo, I. A. (2025). Emotional intelligence in Gen Z teaching undergraduates: The impact of physical activity and biopsychosocial factors. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(7), 123.
Shanmugasundaram, M. S., & Tamilarasu, A. T. (2023). The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: A review. Frontiers in Cognition, 2, 1203077.
Suyanto, S., Ilham, R., & Syamlan, A. F. (2025). The role of emotional intelligence in enhancing employee engagement among Generation Z. JUMBIWIRA Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Kewirausahaan, 4(1), 394-402.
Leave a Reply